Friday, 14 December 2012

Adrienne Maloof On Brandi Glanville: She 'Crossed The Line' (VIDEO)

Tensions rose to a boiling point between Adrienne Maloof and Brandi Glanville on Bravo's "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" when Glanville made a comment about Maloof's family in a recent episode. Now, Maloof is speaking out against her co-star, saying she has "crossed the line."

In Monday's episode, Maloof and Glanville went to war over comments Eddie Cibrian's ex made about the Palms Casino mogul. Although Bravo excluded the comments from the episode, WetPaint reports that Glanville said Maloof used a surrogate to have her three children.

Maloof spoke with People magazine about the feud.

"She seems to be addicted to attention and keeping herself relevant, and I think that?s her goal," Maloof told People. "Her antics have crossed the line for me."

People notes that speculation surrounding Glanville's comments centered on Maloof's divorce from husband Paul Nassif.

"I keep my children out of the limelight and I don?t speak about my children," she added. "It's something you don?t even want to address. They deserve to have their privacy, and I am giving my children their privacy. As a mother I do what I can to protect my children and my family."

During Monday's episode, co-star Kim Richards informed Maloof about the comments Glanville reportedly made about her. Nassif called the allegations "defamatory" and a fight ensued with Maloof calling her co-star a liar.

Glanville responded in a Bravo blog post.

"I said something I shouldn't have said and I am sorry and I now regret it," she wrote. "I know, it's shocking right? My mouth gets me in a lot of trouble, but this time I've pissed off the wrong rich person. It is so frustrating when Adrienne or her people say something about me that isn't true or discuss me as a parent, I think she has met my kids one time."

When asked about the comments she made to Maloof, Glanville told RumorFix, ?I can?t [talk about it]! Her [Adrienne's] lawyers made Bravo take it out and me not talk about it.?

Earlier on HuffPost:

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/13/adrienne-maloof-brandi-glanville-surrogate-claims_n_2293786.html

redskins Heisman watch John McAfee Jenny Rivera Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 kobe bryant pacquiao

Thursday, 13 December 2012

Give Your Desktop a History Lesson with These Vintage Photo Wallpapers

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/nZvVC5orX10/

lebron james magic mike trailer Alan Turing brave Stephanie Rice Meet the Pyro Karen Klein

Brits spend year's salary on Christmas during working ... - Clear Debt

by News Team on December 12th, 2012

Brits will spend a total of ?20,072 on Christmas presents over the course of their working lives.

Figures compiled by the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) and MoneySupermarket show that people are parting with an entire year's gross salary for the average earner in the UK.

Individuals are planning to purchase ?445 worth of goods this year, which is up from the previous year's figure of ?437. Spending was also found to peak when people are between the ages of 35 and 54.

However, 77 per cent of respondents said they are concerned about the cost of the festive period, while one-third are very or extremely worried and 52 per cent admitted they spend more than they should.

If people are overstretching themselves, then they may face a financial hangover in the new year. Should this problem spiral out of control, then debt consolidation may be the only option open to them.

A debt management plan offers people who owe at least ?1,500 to more than one creditor the chance to bring their circumstances under control. It means people will only face one affordable monthly payment, while consumers will be left with enough money to live on.

Helen Dean, managing director of scheme development at NEST, said: "It's shocking that it will cost many of us the equivalent of a full year's salary over our working lives. No wonder spending at this time of year is such a concern for so many families.

"Shaving just a little bit off the annual festive bill and focusing on enjoying time with family could mean more peace of mind now and big savings over the long term."

Clare Francis, financial expert at MoneySupermarket, noted people should always be looking to manage their finances so they do not face any unforeseen expenses. With only 37 per cent of individuals using their disposable income to pay for Christmas, she added too many consumers are turning to credit and store cards.

By Amy White

Source: http://www.cleardebt.co.uk/news/brits-spend-years-salary-on_24602.php

2001 a space odyssey barefoot bandit polar bear plunge lovelace antioch the grey review demi moore 911 call

Senator: Rock removal on Mississippi to start soon

(AP) ? Crews might be allowed to begin destroying two rock pinnacles impeding barge traffic on the Mississippi River as early as next week, more than a month ahead of schedule, a senator said Tuesday, cautioning that further steps may be needed to ensure the vital shipping route remains open.

U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., and two river industry trade groups said Tuesday that the Army Corps of Engineers informed them that blasting could start next week, although it wasn't clear which day the work could start or how long it might take. The corps didn't respond to several messages seeking comment.

Removal of the rocks is an important step in keeping the river open to barge traffic. Months of drought have left water levels up to 20 feet below normal along a 180-mile stretch of the river from St. Louis to Cairo, Ill. The problem was made worse last month when the corps cut the outflow from an upper Missouri River dam by two-thirds ? meaning far less Missouri River water flows into the Mississippi.

Officials with the trade groups American Waterways Operators and Waterways Council Inc. said expediting the rock removal will help, but they maintain that the corps also needs to restore some of the Missouri River flow.

"The release of sufficient water from Missouri River reservoirs during the time this rock pinnacle work takes place is essential to preserving a 9-foot channel on the Mississippi River that will sustain commercial navigation and the movement of our nation's critical commodities and exports," said Michael J. Toohey, president and CEO of Waterways Council Inc.

Blunt agreed.

"The corps is finally heeding my calls to expedite rock removal & help prevent a river crisis," Blunt wrote on Twitter. "Water releases from the MO River must be next."

The corps removed many rock pinnacles in the southern Illinois area more than two decades ago. Sonar wasn't as advanced in the late 1980s and new technology recently revealed formations they missed near the towns of Thebes, Ill., and Grand Tower, Ill.

The corps originally planned to hire contractors to get rid of those pinnacles starting in February. Army Assistant Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy met with senators from Mississippi River states about two weeks ago, and at their request ordered the process expedited. Corps officials moved the timeline up, initially to early January, now to December.

The river depth on Tuesday was at about 12 feet in St. Louis. The U.S. Coast Guard has said that if it dips to around 9 feet, further restrictions on barges may become necessary. The National Weather Service has forecast that the river will drop to the 9-foot level late this month, barring significant rainfall.

The Coast Guard has said it does not expect to close the river. But Tom Allegretti, president and CEO of American Waterways Operators, said any additional restrictions on barges will leave the river "as good as closed."

Barges, normally allowed 12-foot drafts, are already restricted to 9-foot drafts because of the low water level. That means lighter and more frequent loads. If the restriction goes to 8 feet, some operators say they'll halt shipping.

The trade groups say a prolonged stoppage of barge traffic could have an economic impact reaching into the billions of dollars. Agricultural products, coal, petroleum and other goods rely on river shipping.

"This is still very much a crisis situation," said Ann McCulloch of American Waterways Operators.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2012-12-11-Drought-River%20Shipping/id-d867d7a9f4b5456ca7957db759d72f2d

san francisco giants Medal of Honor Warfighter Richard Mourdock d t p zynga

fitness health: What To Know About The Hearing Aid

A hearing aid is an electroacoustic device that is designed to amplify and modify sound for the individuals who wear it. This instrument can fit inside of or behind the ear for which it is needed. Similar devices include bone-anchored hearing aids and cochlear implants. Earlier versions of aids were referred to as ear horns or trumpets. They were cones shaped like funnels that collected all the sound energy and then directed it to the canal of the ear.

There are various aids available. Typically they vary in their power and circuitry, as well as size. The most common of styles: BTE, behind the ear; ITE, in the ear; and CIC, completely in canal. BTE versions include a tube, case and earmold. The devices that are made to fit inside of the ear are often higher in cost because they require that custom fittings be done.

Invisible-in-canal versions are placed deep inside ear canals and therefore, invisible. They are fitted to each individual ear. Venting, as well as the placement of the device makes for a naturalesque hearing process. Extended-wear versions are considered the first invisible aids. They are placed in ears where they stay for months before removal. Open-fit aids are small in size and comfortable fit behind the ears, leaving the canal open.

Essentially every model has the capability to be programmed. This means that the wearer is able to adjust settings to fit their needs. Disposable aids contain a long-lasting but non-replaceable battery. When this runs out, the users are expected to purchase a new aid. Bone-anchored types must be surgically placed within the ears. Prior to the onset of in-the-ear aids, eyeglass aids were used. These items were built into the temple area of glasses. These devices are not commonly employed in modern times.

At the very least, these electronic instruments will include a batter, circuity, microphone and receiver. Most units are meant to be wireless. Furthermore, these are programmable and often come with controls or remotes that make changing settings easy for wearers.

Understand that these devices are not able to fix the problem of hearing loss. That is, they cannot repair the problem that is resulting in the loss. Instead, they serve as an aid, making sounds accessible to people. Those with primary auditory cortex or sensorineural loss may find these instruments to be less effective for them. This is because sensorineural loss removes the power to decipher sounds and primary auditory cortex makes people incapable of accepting stimulation, which then results in brains losing cells used for processing sound.

In some parts of the world, publicly funded medical programs give aids to citizens for a discounted price or at no cost. Health care providers do not always cover the cost of these devices and those who need them may have to pay out of pocket. The cost for these devices will range, but typically ranges from several hundred dollars to thousands.

A hearing aid is a device that is used to modify and amplify sounds for individuals who suffer from hearing loss. These aids come in many different forms and generally allow for wearers to adjust settings. Such units are not intended to fix the problem that cause the loss.

Source: http://www.fitness-health.net/2012/12/what-to-know-about-hearing-aid.html

academy of country music awards brad paisley zac brown band aubrey born to run pranks pregnancy test

Wednesday, 12 December 2012

Michigan weakens union rights in home of auto industry

LANSING, Michigan (Reuters) - Michigan enacted a ban on mandatory union membership on Tuesday, dealing a stunning blow to organized labor in the state that is home to U.S. automakers and the symbol of industrial labor in the United States.

As more than 12,000 unionized workers and supporters protested at the Capitol in Lansing, the Republican-led state House of Representatives gave final approval to a pair of "right-to-work" bills covering public- and private-sector unions.

Republican Governor Rick Snyder signed the bills into law as soon as they reached his desk, completing in a few days a campaign to make Michigan the 24th U.S. state to prohibit unions from requiring employees to join and contribute dues.

"I view this as an opportunity to stand up for Michigan's workers, to be pro-worker," Snyder told a news conference after he signed the bills.

The laws will take effect 90 days after the end of the legislative session, which means they will probably come into force sometime in April. Existing union contracts will not be changed until they expire, according to a provision of the laws.

In a rapid turn of events, Michigan moved from being a bastion of union influence to joining states, mostly in the South, that have weakened local protections for unions.

The Teamsters union national president, James Hoffa, whose father, Jimmy Hoffa, was one of the nation's most famous labor leaders until he disappeared in 1975 in Michigan, denounced Republican leaders in a speech to the protesters.

"Let me tell the governor and all those elected officials who vote for this shameful, divisive bill - there will be repercussions," Hoffa said, adding the Republicans could be defeated in the next election.

Unions have accused Snyder of caving in to wealthy Republican business owners and political donors such as the Koch brothers, owners of an energy and trading conglomerate, and Richard DeVos, the co-founder of Michigan-based Amway.

Snyder, a former computer company executive who had said "right-to-work" legislation was too divisive for Michigan, changed course last week and announced his support for it.

While labor leaders decried the legislation, Republican Representative Lisa Lyons said during the debate in the House that such laws were not an attack on unions.

"This is the day Michigan freed its workers," she said.

Opponents argue that the measures undermine a basic union tenet of bargaining collectively with employers for better wages, benefits and working conditions. They also allow workers to opt out of a union, potentially reducing membership.

By weakening unions, Republicans also could hurt the Democratic Party, which traditionally receives a significant portion of its funding and grass-roots support from unions.

Supporters of right-to-work measures say some unions have become too rigid and workers should be given a choice of whether to join. They also say a more flexible labor market encourages business investment, citing "right-to-work" states where some foreign automakers have put plants rather than in Michigan.

CRIES OF 'SHAME'

The measures were approved to cries of "shame" from protesters inside the Capitol building, which was closed to visitors when it reached capacity of 2,200, Michigan State Police Inspector Gene Adamczyk said.

An estimated 10,000 more people demonstrated outside in cold and snowy conditions, including members of the United Auto Workers union, and teachers, who shut down several schools in the state to attend the rally.

A few protesters were ejected from the Capitol after they chanted slogans from the gallery during the debate. Protesters tore down two tents set up for supporters of "right-to-work" on the grounds of the Capitol. Adamczyk said six people were arrested after scuffling with officers.

A mixture of pepper spray and tear gas was used on one person, Adamczyk said, although Reuters journalists also saw protesters sprayed with a substance at a government building near the Capitol.

The protests recalled big rallies in Wisconsin nearly two years ago when Republicans voted to curb public-sector unions. Wisconsin never tried to pass "right-to-work" bills.

But Indiana earlier this year became the first state in the industrial Midwest to approve "right-to-work" legislation and several other states are watching the Michigan action closely.

LEGAL CHALLENGES LOOM

Republicans in Michigan were also emboldened by the defeat in the November election of a ballot initiative backed by unions that would have enshrined the right to collective bargaining in the state constitution.

Michigan is home of the heavily unionized U.S. auto industry, with some 700 manufacturing plants in the state. The state has the fifth highest percentage of workers who are union members, at 17.5 percent

The Detroit area is headquarters for General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co and Chrysler, which is majority-owned by Fiat SpA.

The UAW was founded in Michigan after a 1932 protest at a Ford plant in Dearborn left five people dead, increasing public sympathy for industrial workers during the Great Depression and leading to national legislation protecting unions.

Major automakers, which secured concessions from the UAW after nearly going bankrupt during the recession of 2008-09, were careful not to take sides publicly in the fight.

All of the so-called Big Three domestic automakers said they were "neutral" on "right-to-work," even though the Michigan Chamber of Commerce strongly supports it.

"At Ford, we are focused on working with all our partners, including the UAW," the company said in a statement on Tuesday.

Democrats and unions have vowed to challenge the new laws in the courts, to try to overturn them in a ballot initiative and possibly oust through recall elections some Republicans who voted for the measures.

Democratic Representative Douglas Geiss said "right-to-work" laws would lead to a resumption of the battles surrounding the creation of unions decades ago.

"There will be fights on the shop floor if many workers announce they will not pay union dues," Geiss said.

(Additional reporting by Robert Carr, David Bailey and Deepa Seetharaman; Editing by Greg McCune and Peter Cooney)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/protesters-march-michigan-capitol-over-vote-054656984.html

Red Cross CMA Awards 2012 election day Electoral College map nyc marathon nyc marathon willie nelson

AP Exclusive: ACLU seeks OAS probe of Padilla case

FILE - In this Jan. 5, 2006 file photo, Jose Padilla, center, is escorted to a waiting police vehicle by federal marshals near downtown Miami. The American Civil Liberties Union says it will ask the OAS' human rights commission to investigate the U.S. government for allegedly violating the rights of convicted terrorism plotter Jose Padilla by labeling him an "enemy combatant" a decade ago and subjecting him to interrogation that amounted to torture, including sleep and sensory deprivation in solitary confinement. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter, File)

FILE - In this Jan. 5, 2006 file photo, Jose Padilla, center, is escorted to a waiting police vehicle by federal marshals near downtown Miami. The American Civil Liberties Union says it will ask the OAS' human rights commission to investigate the U.S. government for allegedly violating the rights of convicted terrorism plotter Jose Padilla by labeling him an "enemy combatant" a decade ago and subjecting him to interrogation that amounted to torture, including sleep and sensory deprivation in solitary confinement. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter, File)

(AP) ? A civil liberties group asked the Organization of American States' human rights commission Tuesday to investigate the U.S. government for what it says are violations of the rights of convicted terrorism plotter Jose Padilla.

The American Civil Liberties Union says the U.S. violated Padilla's rights when it labeled him an "enemy combatant" a decade ago and subjected him to interrogation that amounted to torture, including sleep and sensory deprivation in solitary confinement.

The watchdog legal group told The Associated Press it had filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which serves as the human-rights investigation arm of the Washington-based OAS.

The U.S. has argued in the past that it is not bound by the commission and views its findings as "only recommendations that the United States can ignore or it can follow," according to Steven Watt, the ACLU lawyer who filed the petition. But the findings could still prove awkward for the U.S., which sees itself as a leader on human rights and is quick to criticize other countries it views as falling short on that front.

Jamil Dakwar, the ACLU's human rights program director, said this is the first-ever petition to be filed to the OAS commission by an American citizen against the U.S. government alleging torture and abuse.

It asks the OAS body to recommend that the United States publicly acknowledge the violations and apologize for its unlawful conduct.

The OAS promotes cooperation among the 35 independent countries of the Americas.

State Department spokeswoman Nicole Thompson referred queries to the Justice Department. Officials at Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday and Tuesday.

Among the allegations in the ACLU's petition are that:

?Padilla's interrogation included "painful stress positions, sleep deprivation and sensory deprivation, which caused him severe physical and psychological trauma that persists to this day." It characterized these as "physical and psychological torture and abuse."

?Padilla was denied contact with his lawyers or family during interrogation.

?He was not allowed to practice his religion, Islam. The copy of the Quran he was initially allowed was confiscated.

?His mental state deteriorated so badly that he often refused to meet with lawyers or his family, fearing that would result in his return to military custody.

The ACLU said it was filing the petition on behalf of Padilla and his mother Estela Lebron, contending her rights were also violated when she was not allowed to communicate with or visit her son for years. It said her health has suffered as a result.

Padilla, now 42, a one-time Chicago gang member and car thief, converted to Islam and had lived in Egypt for four years prior to his arrest. He was detained in 2002 in Chicago when he flew back to visit his mother. He was designated an "enemy combatant" ? a status applied by the administration of President George W. Bush to al-Qaida and Taliban terror suspects after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. It meant that he was placed in military custody and denied access to the U.S. civilian justice system.

Padilla was initially held as a "material witness" to the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Authorities at the time said he was on a terrorist mission to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" in a major U.S. city, but he was held at the Navy brig in South Carolina for more than three years without being charged. Padilla eventually was added to an existing terrorism indictment, and was convicted in U.S. federal court in 2007 of supporting terrorism in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya, and is serving a 17-year sentence.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights can undertake investigations of complaints, and in the past has probed massacres in Peru, Colombia and Guatemala. It can also issue "precautionary orders" to ask for the protection of the rights of people in cases under review, and has done so in the case of several Guantanamo detainees who were not U.S. citizens.

"The United States has its obligation under the Constitution and federal law, but it also has its obligations under international law. The U.S. will have to formally respond to the allegations in that petition as if it was filed in a federal court," said Watt, the ACLU attorney filing the petition.

Watt said the OAS commission would probably give the U.S. government about six months to prepare a response, reflecting the legal complexity of the case, which churned through U.S. courts for 10 years and reached the U.S. Supreme Court twice.

The ACLU's filing says those initial accusations against Padilla, according to a sworn U.S. declaration, were based on statements "made by two unnamed suspected terrorists who had been detained and interrogated outside of the United States," one of whom later recanted and the other who had been drugged during interrogation.

In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Padilla's case against Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other U.S. officials in which he claimed he was being held illegally and denied due process. The high court ruled he should have taken the case to a federal court in South Carolina and that the brig commander should have been the target of the case. In June of this year, the Supreme Court declined to hear another appeal of the case.

In September, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Padilla's original 17-year sentence was too lenient for a trained al-Qaida operative who also had a long criminal record as a Chicago gang member. The appellate court granted a request by the Justice Department that Padilla be resentenced. Padilla, according to trial testimony, trained at an al-Qaida camp in Afghanistan.

Last month, Padilla's resentencing was postponed until Jan. 29 by a federal judge after his defense attorney, Michael Caruso, argued his client is deteriorating psychologically after years of isolation and needs more time for family visits.

Caruso said Padilla's family in South Florida has only been able to visit him one time since 2008 at the Supermax prison in Florence, Colorado, where he is kept in solitary confinement 23 hours a day and allowed no contact with other inmates. His mother and sisters were able to see him more regularly after he was taken to a Miami detention center to await resentencing.

Caruso called the harsh prison conditions akin to torture, which was rejected by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Frazier. "He is not in some black hole of Calcutta," Frazier said.

Counting time off for good behavior, Padilla's current prison release date is Jan. 4, 2022.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-12-11-Padilla-Terror%20Charges/id-72d017baffae4d3ca50c09391a84b76c

lesotho a wrinkle in time benjamin netanyahu storm shelters nick lachey chevy volt christina hendricks